История письма и чтения. Асафова Г.К. - 141 стр.

UptoLike

Составители: 

142
loud. Even though instances of silent reading can be traced to earlier dates, not
until the tenth century does this manner of reading become usual in the West.
Augustine, a professor of rhetoric who was well versed in poetics and the
rhythms of prose, a scholar who hated Greek but loved Latin, was in the habit –
common to most readers – of reading anything he found written for sheer delight in
the sounds. For Augustine the spoken word was an intricate part of the text itself.
Written words, from the days of the first Sumerian tablets, were meant to be
pronounced out loud, since the signs carried implicit meaning, as if it were their
soul, a particular sound. The classic phrase scripta manet,vebra volat – which has
come to mean, in our time, “what is written remains, what is spoken vanishes into
air” – used to express the exact opposite. It was coined in praise of the word said
out loud, which has wings and can fly, as compared to the silent word on the page,
which is motionless, dead. Faced with a written text, the reader had a duty to lend
voice to the silent letters, the scripta, and to allow them to become, verba, spoken
words – spirit.
Observing the reading of Saint Ambrose that afternoon in 384, Augustine
could hardly have known what was before him. He thought he was seeing a reader
trying to avoid intrusive visitors. In fact, he was seeing a multitude, a host of silent
readers who over the next many centuries would include many, would include us,
reading him today.
The American psychologist Julian Jaynes, in a controversial study on the
origin of consciousness, argued that the bicameral mind – in which one of the
hemispheres becomes specialized in silent reading – is a late development in
humankind’s evolution, and that the process by which this function develops is still
changing. He suggested that the earliest instances of reading might have been an
aural rather than a visual perception. “Reading in the third millennium BC may
therefore have been a matter of hearing the cuneiform, that is, hallucinating the
speech from looking at its picture-symbols, rather than visual reading of syllables
in our sense.”