ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
14
2. It is a fact however – as Newton and others before him found out – that the
only way light rays from an object point can come to an exact focus at another
point is by reflection at a plane, or flat surface. A plane mirror, for example,
will reflect an image of an object that is perfect and sharp to the last detail. But
when light rays are bent or refracted at a flat, spherical, or elliptical surface
between one medium, such as air, and another such as glass, they give images
that are indistinct.
3. This optical nuisance is called spherical aberration. Because most telescopes
before Newton’s generation had spherical lenses, they all suffered from it.
Even Galileo’s famous telescope was quite a faulty instrument and the strain of
spherical aberration probably helped to make Galileo blind toward the end of
his life. A thorough search was being made by the scientific minds of the day
to try to do away with spherical aberration.
4. Earlier, the great French scientist, Rene Descartes, thought he had solved the
difficulty when he suggested that not spherical lenses were needed but
elliptically shaped ones. Yet the grinding and polishing of such surfaces was a
difficult, if not possible, task in Newton’s time. Even if the workmen of the
day had been able to produce the lenses suggested by Descartes, there would
have been little improvement on the problem. However, it was not aberration
alone that lay at the heart of the difficulty. Actually the fault lay elsewhere, and
not only Galileo and Descartes, but Kepler too, were unaware of this.
5. At Woolsthorpe, when he was only twenty-three, Newton had begun
experimenting with the prism – and had reached the startling conclusion that
there was no way to improve the telescope of Kepler and Galileo. Instruments
would have to be build according to an entirely new idea if men were to view
the heavens with anything like true exactness. Newton had begun to realize
that these early telescopes were inaccurate not only because of spherical
aberration, but because of colour.
6. Think back to Newton’s experiment with the prism at Woolsthorpe. He had
passed white light through his prism and it had broken down, by refraction,
into the colours of the spectrum. Naturally the lenses of these early telescopes
refracted light just as a prism did. This resulted in the blurred colour fringes
that annoyed Galileo and others when, for example, they focused their
instruments on a distant star. Their lenses - whatever their shape – simply
could not produce a sharp, clear image of the star because colours had been
introduced by refraction.
7. Newton, however knew that reflection at any surface would not produce colour
blurring, and he decided to give up the idea of refracting telescopes altogether.
He would build one on the reflection principle. Newton was not the first to
think of the idea, however. A few years before, the distinguished Scottish
14 2. It is a fact however – as Newton and others before him found out – that the only way light rays from an object point can come to an exact focus at another point is by reflection at a plane, or flat surface. A plane mirror, for example, will reflect an image of an object that is perfect and sharp to the last detail. But when light rays are bent or refracted at a flat, spherical, or elliptical surface between one medium, such as air, and another such as glass, they give images that are indistinct. 3. This optical nuisance is called spherical aberration. Because most telescopes before Newton’s generation had spherical lenses, they all suffered from it. Even Galileo’s famous telescope was quite a faulty instrument and the strain of spherical aberration probably helped to make Galileo blind toward the end of his life. A thorough search was being made by the scientific minds of the day to try to do away with spherical aberration. 4. Earlier, the great French scientist, Rene Descartes, thought he had solved the difficulty when he suggested that not spherical lenses were needed but elliptically shaped ones. Yet the grinding and polishing of such surfaces was a difficult, if not possible, task in Newton’s time. Even if the workmen of the day had been able to produce the lenses suggested by Descartes, there would have been little improvement on the problem. However, it was not aberration alone that lay at the heart of the difficulty. Actually the fault lay elsewhere, and not only Galileo and Descartes, but Kepler too, were unaware of this. 5. At Woolsthorpe, when he was only twenty-three, Newton had begun experimenting with the prism – and had reached the startling conclusion that there was no way to improve the telescope of Kepler and Galileo. Instruments would have to be build according to an entirely new idea if men were to view the heavens with anything like true exactness. Newton had begun to realize that these early telescopes were inaccurate not only because of spherical aberration, but because of colour. 6. Think back to Newton’s experiment with the prism at Woolsthorpe. He had passed white light through his prism and it had broken down, by refraction, into the colours of the spectrum. Naturally the lenses of these early telescopes refracted light just as a prism did. This resulted in the blurred colour fringes that annoyed Galileo and others when, for example, they focused their instruments on a distant star. Their lenses - whatever their shape – simply could not produce a sharp, clear image of the star because colours had been introduced by refraction. 7. Newton, however knew that reflection at any surface would not produce colour blurring, and he decided to give up the idea of refracting telescopes altogether. He would build one on the reflection principle. Newton was not the first to think of the idea, however. A few years before, the distinguished Scottish
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »