Неличные формы глагола. Артикль. Гоголь О.В. - 27 стр.

UptoLike

Составители: 

53
usually reserved for special weekends for to celebrations at the end of
the term exams.
One would gather from the above that America is a nation of heavy
drinkers and closet alcoholics. Yet, there are many Americans who
never touch a drink either for reasons of religion or health. They may
even detest the smell of beer and the taste of liquor and may refuse
(serve) it even to guests who visit in their home. In the nation’s history
there was even a period (know) as the Prohibition. This was a time
when liquor laws prevented the (manufacture) and distribution of al-
coholic beverages. The temperance movement gained impetus in
World War I when conservation policies limited liquor output. In 1919
the 18
th
amendment to the Constitution established prohibition. At that
time back in the 1930’s the manufacturing and (sell) of alcohol was
strictly forbidden by law. What alcohol was produced was done so ille-
gally and was in the hands of (organize) crime. It was difficult (en-
force) and in 1933 prohibition was repealed by the 21
st
amendment.
Although the law had been repealed the attitude of those who endorsed
it has not. Today there are many federal laws regulating the advertise-
ment of alcohol. Even TV commercials advertising beer and wine are
prevented from (show) on TV for fear of the negative impact they
might (have) on children.
It is also recommended that at a party a host should refuse (offer) alco-
hol to anyone who has a heavy (drink) problem, and there are states
where the sales of alcoholic beverages is carefully regulated by local
governments. In many states liquor stores are required (close) on Sun-
day which is considered the Lord’s Day.
TEXT SIXTEEN THE AMERICAN JURY SYSTEM
One of the features of the American Justice system is the concept of a
jury. In America a jury is usually a group of twelve men and women
who preside at a trial and determine the innocence or guilt of the per-
son on trial. In common law it is a group of laymen (summon) (study)
the evidence and determine the facts in a dispute tried in a court of law.
The 6
th
and 7
th
amendment to the Constitution provides for a jury trial
in most criminal cases. The use of the jury system is an important pro-
tection against judicial tyranny and represents the voice of the people.
54
The members of the jury (choose) by law and sworn (consider) the
facts of a case and decide upon the truth. A jury is composed of aver-
age citizens (select) from the list of voters. Almost any citizen over 21
can be a juror. This is one of the main ways in which men and women
take part in the government. A juror receives notice through the mail
that he or she has been chosen for jury duty and it is his or her respon-
sibility (accept) and appear on a jury. Jurors are called for (vary) peri-
ods of time according to state law, usually for two weeks. If they are
workers, employers have (excuse) them from their work. There may be
occasions, however, when one may (excuse) because of a specific work
or home situation, but exceptions are not always granted.
At a trial, the jury listens to both the defense and the prosecution. They
hear the testimony of witnesses and the arguments of lawyers on both
sides of the case. They are presented with evidence, either concrete or
circumstantial, and the judge (preside) over the case gives them final
directions (follow) in (help) them (make) a decision. The decision,
however, is completely theirs. Jury verdicts represent the common
sense judgments of ordinary people. Critics of the system claim that
clever lawyers often use shrewd psychology (influence) a jury.
When the time comes for them (deliberate) the verdict, they are ush-
ered into a (close) room where they decide if the defendant is guilty or
innocent. This is painstaking and may take a long time because a jury’s
decision must be unanimous. All twelve members must be in agree-
ment for a verdict to be given. Should one member of the jury persist
and refuse (go along) with the other eleven, the situation is called a
hung jury. At this point a new jury might have (select) and the entire
process repeated. Recently, however, some states allow majority ver-
dicts in some cases, since unanimous decisions can become difficult
and troublesome. The jury system has its merits and demerits, and there
are those who oppose it while others are its staunch defenders. The bot-
tom line in the argument is whether or not a man should (judge) by his
own peers who themselves share equal limitations and inherent preju-
dices. Some legal experts do not believe that they system works well
and in many cases juries are being used less and less. Some feel that
the jury often takes too much time (decide) a case or the jurors them-
selves are not totally objective. True judgment, some believe, belongs
only in the hands of those who have studied all the nuances of the law
usually reserved for special weekends for to celebrations at the end of      The members of the jury (choose) by law and sworn (consider) the
the term exams.                                                              facts of a case and decide upon the truth. A jury is composed of aver-
One would gather from the above that America is a nation of heavy            age citizens (select) from the list of voters. Almost any citizen over 21
drinkers and closet alcoholics. Yet, there are many Americans who            can be a juror. This is one of the main ways in which men and women
never touch a drink either for reasons of religion or health. They may       take part in the government. A juror receives notice through the mail
even detest the smell of beer and the taste of liquor and may refuse         that he or she has been chosen for jury duty and it is his or her respon-
(serve) it even to guests who visit in their home. In the nation’s history   sibility (accept) and appear on a jury. Jurors are called for (vary) peri-
there was even a period (know) as the Prohibition. This was a time           ods of time according to state law, usually for two weeks. If they are
when liquor laws prevented the (manufacture) and distribution of al-         workers, employers have (excuse) them from their work. There may be
coholic beverages. The temperance movement gained impetus in                 occasions, however, when one may (excuse) because of a specific work
World War I when conservation policies limited liquor output. In 1919        or home situation, but exceptions are not always granted.
the 18th amendment to the Constitution established prohibition. At that      At a trial, the jury listens to both the defense and the prosecution. They
time back in the 1930’s the manufacturing and (sell) of alcohol was          hear the testimony of witnesses and the arguments of lawyers on both
strictly forbidden by law. What alcohol was produced was done so ille-       sides of the case. They are presented with evidence, either concrete or
gally and was in the hands of (organize) crime. It was difficult (en-        circumstantial, and the judge (preside) over the case gives them final
force) and in 1933 prohibition was repealed by the 21st amendment.           directions (follow) in (help) them (make) a decision. The decision,
Although the law had been repealed the attitude of those who endorsed        however, is completely theirs. Jury verdicts represent the common
it has not. Today there are many federal laws regulating the advertise-      sense judgments of ordinary people. Critics of the system claim that
ment of alcohol. Even TV commercials advertising beer and wine are           clever lawyers often use shrewd psychology (influence) a jury.
prevented from (show) on TV for fear of the negative impact they             When the time comes for them (deliberate) the verdict, they are ush-
might (have) on children.                                                    ered into a (close) room where they decide if the defendant is guilty or
It is also recommended that at a party a host should refuse (offer) alco-    innocent. This is painstaking and may take a long time because a jury’s
hol to anyone who has a heavy (drink) problem, and there are states          decision must be unanimous. All twelve members must be in agree-
where the sales of alcoholic beverages is carefully regulated by local       ment for a verdict to be given. Should one member of the jury persist
governments. In many states liquor stores are required (close) on Sun-       and refuse (go along) with the other eleven, the situation is called a
day which is considered the Lord’s Day.                                      hung jury. At this point a new jury might have (select) and the entire
                                                                             process repeated. Recently, however, some states allow majority ver-
TEXT SIXTEEN                     THE AMERICAN JURY SYSTEM                    dicts in some cases, since unanimous decisions can become difficult
                                                                             and troublesome. The jury system has its merits and demerits, and there
One of the features of the American Justice system is the concept of a       are those who oppose it while others are its staunch defenders. The bot-
jury. In America a jury is usually a group of twelve men and women           tom line in the argument is whether or not a man should (judge) by his
who preside at a trial and determine the innocence or guilt of the per-      own peers who themselves share equal limitations and inherent preju-
son on trial. In common law it is a group of laymen (summon) (study)         dices. Some legal experts do not believe that they system works well
the evidence and determine the facts in a dispute tried in a court of law.   and in many cases juries are being used less and less. Some feel that
The 6th and 7th amendment to the Constitution provides for a jury trial      the jury often takes too much time (decide) a case or the jurors them-
in most criminal cases. The use of the jury system is an important pro-      selves are not totally objective. True judgment, some believe, belongs
tection against judicial tyranny and represents the voice of the people.     only in the hands of those who have studied all the nuances of the law

                                   53                                                                           54