Две теории биологической эволюции. Гродницкий Д.Л. - 146 стр.

UptoLike

Составители: 

Рубрика: 

Gehring W. J. Homeotic genes, the homeo box, and the genetic control of development // Cold
Spring Harbor Symposia in Quantitative Biology, 1985. Vol. 50 (Molecular Biology of
Development). P. 243–251.
Gehring W. J., Hiromi Y. Homeotic genes and the homeobox // Annual Review of Genetics,
1986. Vol. 20. P. 147–173.
Gerhart J., Kirschner M. Cells, Embryos and Evolution. Toward a Cellular and Developmental
Understanding of Phenotypic Variation and Evolutionary Adaptability.— Oxford:
Blackwell Science, 1997. 642 p.
Gingerich P. D. Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates // Amer. J. Sci., 1993.
Vol. 293–A. P. 453–478.
Goldschmidt R. Physiological genetics.— New York – London: McGrawHill, 1938. 375 p.
Goldschmidt R. The material basis of evolution.— New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1940. 436 p.
Goldschmidt R. Theoretical genetics.— Los Angeles: Univ. California Press, 1955. 563 p.
Goodwin B. C. Development and evolution // J. Theor. Biol., 1982. Vol. 97. P. 43–55.
Goodwin B. C. What are the causes of morphogenesis? // BioEssays, 1985. Vol. 3. № 1.
P. 32–36.
Goodwin B. C. The evolution of generic forms // Organizational Constraints on the Dynamics
of Evolution / Eds: Maynard Smith J., Vida G. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.,
1990. P. 107–117.
Goodwin B. C. Development as a robust natural process // Thinking about Biology / Eds:
Stein W. D., Varela F.— Reading (MA): AddisonWesley, 1993. P. 123–148.
Goodwin B. C. Homology, development, and heredity // Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of
Comparative Biology / Ed.: Hall B.— K. San Diego: Adacemic Press, 1994.
P. 229–247.
Goodwin B. How the Leopard changed its spots. The evolution of complexity.— London:
Phoenix, 1997. 233 p.
Goodwin B. C., Kauffman S. A., Murray J. D. Is morphogenesis an intrinsically robust
process? // J. theor. Biol., 1993. Vol. 163. № 1. P. 135–144.
Goodwin B. C., Trainor L. E. H. The ontogeny and phylogeny of the pentadactyl limb //
Development and Evolution / Eds: Goodwin B. C., Holder N., Wylie C. G.—
Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983. P. 75–98.
Gottlieb G. Individual Development and Evolution. The genesis of Novel Behaviour.— New
York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992. 231 p.
Gould S. J. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny // Biol. Rev., 1966. Vol. 42.
P. 587–640.
Gould S. J. Geometric similarity in allometric growth: a contribution to the problem of scaling
in the evolution of size // Amer. Natur., 1971. Vol. 105. № 942. P. 113–136.
Gould S. J. Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and the evolution of the brain //
Contrib. Primatol., 1975. Vol. 5. P. 201–241.
Gould S. J. The return of hopeful monsters // Natural history, 1977. JuneJuly. P. 22–30.
Gould S. J. Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? // Paleobiology, 1980. Vol. 6.
№ 1. P. 119–130.
Gould S. J., Lewontin R. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A cri
tique of the adaptationist programme // Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1979. Vol. B 205.
№ 1161. P. 581–598.
Gould S. J. But not Wright enough: reply to Orzack // Paleobiology, 1981. Vol. 7. № 1.
P. 131–134.
147
ЛИТЕРАТУРА