ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
129
church should listen and learn from them. It is a controversy likely to persist
well into the twenty-first century.
The Church of England was traditionally identified with the ruling estab-
lishment and with authority, but it has been distancing itself over the past 25
years or so, and may eventually disengage from the state. “Disestablishment”, as
this is known, becomes a topic for discussion each time the Church and state
clash over some issue. Since 1979 the Church has been ready to criticise aspects
of official social policy (see below).
Nevertheless, the Church of England remains overwhelmingly conven-
tional and middle class in its social composition, having been mainly middle
and upper class in character since the Industrial Revolution. Most working-class
people in England and Wales who are religious belong to the nonconformist or
“Free” Churches, while others have joined the Catholic Church in the past 140
years.
Because of its position, the Anglican Church has inherited a great legacy of
ancient cathedrals and parish churches. It is caught between the value of these
magnificent buildings as places of worship, and the enormous cost of their up-
keep. The state provides about 10 per cent of the cost of maintaining the fabric
of historic churches.
The other Christian churches
The Free or nonconformist churches are distinguished by having no bish-
ops, or “episcopacy”, and they all admit both women and men to their ministry.
The main ones today are: the Methodist Union (400,000 full adult members);
the Baptists (150,000); the-United Reformed Church (110,000) and the Salva-
tion Army (50,000). These all tend towards strong evangelicalism. In the case
of the Methodists and Baptists, there are also smaller splinter groups. In addi-
tion there are a considerable number of smaller sects. Most of these churches
are, like the Anglicans, in numerical decline.
In Scotland the Church, or Kirk, vehemently rejected the idea of bishops,
following a more Calvinist Protestant tradition. Its churches are plain. There is
no altar, only a table, and the emphasis is on the pulpit, where the Gospel is
preached. The Kirk is more democratic than the Anglican Church. Although
each Kirk is assigned a minister, it also elects its own “elders”. The minister
and one of these elders represent the Kirk at the regional presbytery. Each of the
46 presbyteries of Scotland elects two commissioners to represent it at the prin-
cipal governing body of the Church, the General Assembly. Each year the
commissioners meet in the General Assembly, and elect a Moderator to chair
the General Assembly for that year. Unlike the Church of England, the Church
of Scotland is subject neither to the Crown nor to Parliament, and takes pride in
its independence from state authority, for which it fought in the sixteenth and
130
seventeenth centuries. In keeping with its democratic nature, it admits women
as well as men to the ministry.
Among all these Protestant churches, but particularly among the larger
English ones, there has been a recent important development called the “house
church” movement. This began in the 1970s and has a membership of roughly
90,000, although attendance is far higher. This movement is a network of
autonomous “churches” of usually not more than 100 members in each. These
churches meet, usually in groups of 15 or 20, in members’ homes for worship
and prayer meetings. Most of those joining such groups are in the 20–40 year-
old age range and belong to the professional middle classes – solicitors, doctors
and so forth – who have felt frustrated with the more ponderous style of the lar-
ger churches They try to recapture what they imagine was the vitality of the
early church, but it is doubtful how long these house churches will last. If they
are anything like some of the revivalist sects of the nineteenth century, they in
their turn will lose their vitality, and discontented members may return to the
churches which their predecessors left, or drift away from the Christian church
altogether.
The Protestant churches of Britain undoubtedly owe part of the revival tak-
ing place in some evangelical churches to the vitality of the West Indian
churches. West Indian immigrants in the 1950s and 1960s were not welcomed
into Anglican churches, and many decided to form their own churches Their
music and informal joyfulness of worship spread quickly in evangelical circles.
As Philip Mohabir, a West Indian, describes:
Congregations that would have been cold, dull and boring, would now sing
to guitar music, clap their hands, and even play tambourines. Those were
things that only West Indian churches did… Now people would raise their
hands in the air and clap and even dance. English, white, evangelical Chris-
tians dancing and clapping their hands, praising God. That in itself is a miracle
we West Indian Christians never thought would happen.
The Roman Catholic Church only returned to Britain in 1850. During the
preceding 300 years the few Catholic families which refused to accept the new
Church were popularly viewed as less than wholeheartedly English. The Eng-
lish Protestant prejudice that to be Catholic is to be not quite wholly English
only really disappeared in the 1960s.
The Roman Catholic Church grew rapidly after 1850, particularly among
the industrial working class. By the mid 1980s it had about 5,7 million mem-
bers, of whom 1,4 million were regular attenders. By the mid 1990s this had
fallen to 1,1 million attenders, a decline of over 17 per cent. Alongside growing
secularism in society, many have left the Catholic Church because of its au-
thoritarian conservatism, particularly in the field of sexual mores. It is estimated
that attendance will barely exceed 600,000 by the year 2005. The Catholic
church should listen and learn from them. It is a controversy likely to persist seventeenth centuries. In keeping with its democratic nature, it admits women well into the twenty-first century. as well as men to the ministry. The Church of England was traditionally identified with the ruling estab- Among all these Protestant churches, but particularly among the larger lishment and with authority, but it has been distancing itself over the past 25 English ones, there has been a recent important development called the “house years or so, and may eventually disengage from the state. “Disestablishment”, as church” movement. This began in the 1970s and has a membership of roughly this is known, becomes a topic for discussion each time the Church and state 90,000, although attendance is far higher. This movement is a network of clash over some issue. Since 1979 the Church has been ready to criticise aspects autonomous “churches” of usually not more than 100 members in each. These of official social policy (see below). churches meet, usually in groups of 15 or 20, in members’ homes for worship Nevertheless, the Church of England remains overwhelmingly conven- and prayer meetings. Most of those joining such groups are in the 20–40 year- tional and middle class in its social composition, having been mainly middle old age range and belong to the professional middle classes – solicitors, doctors and upper class in character since the Industrial Revolution. Most working-class and so forth – who have felt frustrated with the more ponderous style of the lar- people in England and Wales who are religious belong to the nonconformist or ger churches They try to recapture what they imagine was the vitality of the “Free” Churches, while others have joined the Catholic Church in the past 140 early church, but it is doubtful how long these house churches will last. If they years. are anything like some of the revivalist sects of the nineteenth century, they in Because of its position, the Anglican Church has inherited a great legacy of their turn will lose their vitality, and discontented members may return to the ancient cathedrals and parish churches. It is caught between the value of these churches which their predecessors left, or drift away from the Christian church magnificent buildings as places of worship, and the enormous cost of their up- altogether. keep. The state provides about 10 per cent of the cost of maintaining the fabric The Protestant churches of Britain undoubtedly owe part of the revival tak- of historic churches. ing place in some evangelical churches to the vitality of the West Indian churches. West Indian immigrants in the 1950s and 1960s were not welcomed The other Christian churches into Anglican churches, and many decided to form their own churches Their The Free or nonconformist churches are distinguished by having no bish- music and informal joyfulness of worship spread quickly in evangelical circles. ops, or “episcopacy”, and they all admit both women and men to their ministry. As Philip Mohabir, a West Indian, describes: The main ones today are: the Methodist Union (400,000 full adult members); Congregations that would have been cold, dull and boring, would now sing the Baptists (150,000); the-United Reformed Church (110,000) and the Salva- to guitar music, clap their hands, and even play tambourines. Those were tion Army (50,000). These all tend towards strong evangelicalism. In the case things that only West Indian churches did… Now people would raise their of the Methodists and Baptists, there are also smaller splinter groups. In addi- hands in the air and clap and even dance. English, white, evangelical Chris- tion there are a considerable number of smaller sects. Most of these churches tians dancing and clapping their hands, praising God. That in itself is a miracle are, like the Anglicans, in numerical decline. we West Indian Christians never thought would happen. In Scotland the Church, or Kirk, vehemently rejected the idea of bishops, The Roman Catholic Church only returned to Britain in 1850. During the following a more Calvinist Protestant tradition. Its churches are plain. There is preceding 300 years the few Catholic families which refused to accept the new no altar, only a table, and the emphasis is on the pulpit, where the Gospel is Church were popularly viewed as less than wholeheartedly English. The Eng- preached. The Kirk is more democratic than the Anglican Church. Although lish Protestant prejudice that to be Catholic is to be not quite wholly English each Kirk is assigned a minister, it also elects its own “elders”. The minister only really disappeared in the 1960s. and one of these elders represent the Kirk at the regional presbytery. Each of the The Roman Catholic Church grew rapidly after 1850, particularly among 46 presbyteries of Scotland elects two commissioners to represent it at the prin- the industrial working class. By the mid 1980s it had about 5,7 million mem- cipal governing body of the Church, the General Assembly. Each year the bers, of whom 1,4 million were regular attenders. By the mid 1990s this had commissioners meet in the General Assembly, and elect a Moderator to chair fallen to 1,1 million attenders, a decline of over 17 per cent. Alongside growing the General Assembly for that year. Unlike the Church of England, the Church secularism in society, many have left the Catholic Church because of its au- of Scotland is subject neither to the Crown nor to Parliament, and takes pride in thoritarian conservatism, particularly in the field of sexual mores. It is estimated its independence from state authority, for which it fought in the sixteenth and that attendance will barely exceed 600,000 by the year 2005. The Catholic 129 130
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »