Английский язык. Система упражнений для формирования грамматической компетенции студентов: ситуативный контекст. Тимофеева Т.И. - 92 стр.

UptoLike

Составители: 

92
TEXT 3. GOVERNMENT POLICIES ARE THREATENING THE
DOMINANCE IN EUROPE OF BRITISH UNIVERSITIES
In the days not so long ago when British universities were full of optimism and self-
confidence, and the smell of fresh paint was everywhere, I received a visit from an
academic working in France. He was on a mission to find out why the UK higher
education sector was doing so well compared to our European counterparts. He
showed me a world ranking table, which listed 29 UK universities in the top 200,
compared to Germany, with 14, and France, with three, just above Spain's two and
Italy's zero. His beloved Sorbonne, perhaps the one university in continental Europe
that the man on the Clapham omnibus can name, was nowhere to be seen. What could
they do to catch up?
Before answering that question, a bit of wallowing and boasting seems in order. At
the end of the second world war the UK, with the US and USSR, was one of the three
world super-powers. World influence, empire and economic strength all faded, but
academia, alongside snooker and darts, is one of the few areas where we retain
world-class status.
Speaking English, the international language of scholarship, must be a huge
advantage. I was once told that America once debated whether to adopt English or
German. This is a load of nonsense, apparently, but it raises a fascinating question.
How would things have turned out if America had adopted German? One thing's for
sure: our university world rankings would suffer, though I doubt that this would be
the biggest story. But speaking English is not all there is to it. Like it or not, the
research assessment exercise changed attitudes to publication. League tables and
research assessment, both crude and potentially distorting of academic values, are
made for each other.
In addition, the government understood that if you wanted a flourishing university
system it would cost money. True, we were "comfortable" rather than wealthy.
Money always was tight, but if something was important, funding would be found.