История письма и чтения. Асафова Г.К. - 87 стр.

UptoLike

Составители: 

88
A code they could not track
Alberti developed a disc made up of two dials fixed in the centre. Twenty
letters of the alphabet (excluding H,J,K,U,W and Y) and the numbers 1-4 were
written around the edge of the outer plate. A jumbled Latin alphabet was written
around the edge of the inner plate. To create a message, the sender took a letter
from the outer plate, then read off the cipher equivalent from the inner plate.
After a given number of letters, the inner plate was turned an agreed number of
positions so that the alphabet was represented by a different set of ciphers. The
recipient, of course, had to be equipped with the same cipher disc and know when
to turn the plate. Another polyalphabetic system involved writing out the letters of
the alphabet repeatedly in a table. At its simplest, the first line was the normal
alphabet (a-z); the second line began the alphabet with “b” and ended with “a”, the
third ran from “c” to “b” and so on. The sender and the recipient agreed on a secret
“keyword”- usually a term or a phrase.
To stop keywords from falling into the wrong hands, French diplomat Blaise
de Vegenere developed the “autokey”. The message itself contained the keyword,
signalled by a “priming key” – a letter or letters recognised as such by the
recipient. In this way the keyword changed with every message.
Polyalphabetic ciphers were considered uncrackable. However, if either the
sender or the recipient made an error, the text became nonsense. It was until the
age of machine-generated codes that they came into their own. The English
system, used by the Germans during the Second World War, was based on such a
system, as are many computer-generated codes used today – which because of the
speed at which they can be altered, are virtually impossible to break.
VOCABULARY
Abound v.
Изобиловать, кишеть
Break v.
Расшифровывать, разгадывать