ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
31
daily to maintain or re-impose state control of the media. In Tajikistan,
beset by civil war, the government suppressed all independent media.
In Armenia police habitually raid editorial offices. In Romania journal-
ists are often under surveillance. In Slovakia a proposed law would
provide one- to five-year jail sentences for journalists who «demean»
the country from abroad. In Poland, the Czech republic and Hungary
the situation is better, but everywhere governments exert pressure by
controlling paper supplies, distribution facilities and especially broad-
cast licenses.
The battle is not confined to former communist areas. In Turkey,
a NATO member, more than 70 journalists were in jail at the end of
last year. Despite much progress in Latin America, licensing of journal-
ists and other controls are widespread. Argentina recently threatened to
pass a law providing up to 10 years of prison for «dishonoring the
name of a politician».
Many of the world’s governments have enshrined press freedom
in their constitutions but fed free to ignore it. A charter drawn up by the
World Press Freedom Committee condemns censorship in all its forms
and proclaims freedom of expression as an essential human right. But
government resistance to the charter’s principles is tenacious. There is
the argument from patriotism: nations, especially when in crisis, cannot
tolerate destructive criticism. There is the argument from culture: cha-
otic Western concepts of freedom cannot be applied to societies based
on order and stability. There is the argument from economics: undue
press attacks undermine development. There is the argument from ide-
alism: an irresponsible press is apt to spread racial and ethnic hatred.
All of these assertions contain elements of truth. It is nearly impossible
to export the First Amendment of the American Constitution, for ex-
ample, to countries without deep roots and habits of freedom. In many
parts of the world, journalists lack any tradition of objective reporting.
But for the most part the fight against press freedom comes down to
politicians protecting themselves and the status quo.
That is ultimately untenable in a world of instant communica-
tions that cross all frontiers. Arid in a global marketplace the notion
that authoritarian rule can be combined with free enterprise – the no-
tion might be called Lee Kuan Yewism, for Singapore’s Godfather –
cannot work indefinitely.
32
The U.S. maintains that countries aspiring to membership in
NATO in the European Union or in the wider community of developed
nations must respect democracy, free enterprise and human rights. But
Washington is notably passive in promoting freedom of the press.
Why should Americans care? Because if there is to be a world in
which the U.S. can enjoy a measure of security and prosperity, the
spread of democracy is essential. And democracy is impossible without
a free press. Free and responsible, of course. But responsibility is not
likely to be taught by the Twyn treatment or lesser forms of repression.
Looking at the rest of the world, American journalists have rea-
son to be grateful that the only real threat they face is angry words.
And the American public has reason to be grateful that its press, for all
its sins, is still the most professional and responsible in the world.
Could that mutual recognition produce a glimmer of detente between
press and citizens? According to recent surveys, a majority of Ameri-
cans believe that the media only get in the way of solving problems.
But a majority also believe that the press keeps powerful people from
becoming too powerful. Perhaps that thought should be the message of
World Press Freedom Day, everywhere, including the U.S.
EXERCISE 1. Answer the following comprehension questions
1) Why did UNESCO proclaim World Press Freedom Day?
2) What is the state of things with the freedom of press in Russia
and in former communist countries?
3) What arguments are given by some governments to restrict
press freedom?
4) Why do most of the world’s governments feel free to ignore
freedom of the press, according to the writer?
5) Why does the author think that it is impossible to export the
First Amendment of the American Constitution?
6) Is the author optimistic about maintaining and promoting
press freedom all over the world?
7) Is the writer satisfied with the American press?
8) Why does the writer think that Americans should care about
the freedom of the world press?
daily to maintain or re-impose state control of the media. In Tajikistan, The U.S. maintains that countries aspiring to membership in beset by civil war, the government suppressed all independent media. NATO in the European Union or in the wider community of developed In Armenia police habitually raid editorial offices. In Romania journal- nations must respect democracy, free enterprise and human rights. But ists are often under surveillance. In Slovakia a proposed law would Washington is notably passive in promoting freedom of the press. provide one- to five-year jail sentences for journalists who «demean» Why should Americans care? Because if there is to be a world in the country from abroad. In Poland, the Czech republic and Hungary which the U.S. can enjoy a measure of security and prosperity, the the situation is better, but everywhere governments exert pressure by spread of democracy is essential. And democracy is impossible without controlling paper supplies, distribution facilities and especially broad- a free press. Free and responsible, of course. But responsibility is not cast licenses. likely to be taught by the Twyn treatment or lesser forms of repression. The battle is not confined to former communist areas. In Turkey, Looking at the rest of the world, American journalists have rea- a NATO member, more than 70 journalists were in jail at the end of son to be grateful that the only real threat they face is angry words. last year. Despite much progress in Latin America, licensing of journal- And the American public has reason to be grateful that its press, for all ists and other controls are widespread. Argentina recently threatened to its sins, is still the most professional and responsible in the world. pass a law providing up to 10 years of prison for «dishonoring the Could that mutual recognition produce a glimmer of detente between name of a politician». press and citizens? According to recent surveys, a majority of Ameri- Many of the world’s governments have enshrined press freedom cans believe that the media only get in the way of solving problems. in their constitutions but fed free to ignore it. A charter drawn up by the But a majority also believe that the press keeps powerful people from World Press Freedom Committee condemns censorship in all its forms becoming too powerful. Perhaps that thought should be the message of and proclaims freedom of expression as an essential human right. But World Press Freedom Day, everywhere, including the U.S. government resistance to the charter’s principles is tenacious. There is the argument from patriotism: nations, especially when in crisis, cannot EXERCISE 1. Answer the following comprehension questions tolerate destructive criticism. There is the argument from culture: cha- 1) Why did UNESCO proclaim World Press Freedom Day? otic Western concepts of freedom cannot be applied to societies based 2) What is the state of things with the freedom of press in Russia on order and stability. There is the argument from economics: undue and in former communist countries? press attacks undermine development. There is the argument from ide- 3) What arguments are given by some governments to restrict alism: an irresponsible press is apt to spread racial and ethnic hatred. press freedom? All of these assertions contain elements of truth. It is nearly impossible 4) Why do most of the world’s governments feel free to ignore to export the First Amendment of the American Constitution, for ex- freedom of the press, according to the writer? ample, to countries without deep roots and habits of freedom. In many 5) Why does the author think that it is impossible to export the parts of the world, journalists lack any tradition of objective reporting. First Amendment of the American Constitution? But for the most part the fight against press freedom comes down to 6) Is the author optimistic about maintaining and promoting politicians protecting themselves and the status quo. press freedom all over the world? That is ultimately untenable in a world of instant communica- 7) Is the writer satisfied with the American press? tions that cross all frontiers. Arid in a global marketplace the notion 8) Why does the writer think that Americans should care about that authoritarian rule can be combined with free enterprise – the no- the freedom of the world press? tion might be called Lee Kuan Yewism, for Singapore’s Godfather – cannot work indefinitely. 31 32
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »