ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
53
AIRLINE SECURITY: DISHONEST WORDS ON RACIAL PROFILING
MUDDY DEBATE ON AIRLINE SECURITY
It was a scene that a Hollywood scriptwriter might have dreamt up
for one of those earnest television dramas that explore contemporary issues.
But in this real-life scenario there has been no sex or romance.
It is Christmas Day, three months after the trauma of September 11,
and a planeload of exhausted, slightly nervous passengers are heading
home at the last minute for the holidays, on American Airlines flight 363
from Baltimore Washington International airport to Dallas-Fort Worth. As
has happened on many commercial flights since the terrorist attacks, an
Arab-American undergoes scrutiny.
He objects, but is ultimately left at the gate. Such situations have be-
come a fact of life on domestic flights in the United States, but this time it
is different. It turns out that the Arab-American, Walied Shater, is a secret
serviceman on his way to guard President George Bush at the «Western
White House» in Crawford, Texas. Big trouble ensues.
The Christmas incident was doomed to degenerate into a rhetoric-
laden mess as soon as the first lawyer or television pundit used the two
words «racial profiling» – one of the hottest of hot-button issues in con-
temporary America. The President himself threatened he would be «mad-
der than heck» if it turned out that Shater was a victim of such a practice, in
which citizens are picked out for special attention because of skin colour,
name or religion. American Airlines denied Shater had been kicked off the
flight because of his Arab-American identity. Instead, the troubled airline
(which lost two planes on September 11) published critical accounts of his
behaviour, describing him as irate and confrontational. He had filled in a
form allowing government security officers to carry guns on planes, but
had filled it in wrongly twice. His identity was eventually confirmed by the
Secret Service, but he had become so truculent by then it was judged best
to leave him behind.
Shater has hired lawyers to demand an apology and force a change
in the airline's security measures. The lawyers have gone on television to
deny the claims that the presidential bodyguard had behaved unprofession-
ally. It was the pilot, the lawyers insist, who was confrontational. They say
that there had been no problem with the gun-carrying forms until the pilot
became aware of the passenger's Arab-American identity and a flight atten-
dant discovered a book on Arab history among his possessions. It looks like
one of those simmering affairs that will run and run on the radio talk-
54
shows. Furthermore the whole discussion is handicapped, from the Presi-
dent down, by a fundamental dishonesty about the issues in play.
It is a fact that Arab-Americans and people with Muslim names have
been subjected to much more scrutiny than fellow passengers on flights
since September 11. There have been multiple cases of people being left off
planes because the flight crew and the passengers felt queasy about their
Middle Eastern appearance. A commercial airline pilot I know told me in
blunt terms that one of the key items on the «new security» checklist is
scanning the passenger manifest for Islamic names. American Airlines'
claim that Shater's Arab-American identity and his book on Arab history
had nothing to do with the pilot's decision looks dubious, to say the least. It
is hard to imagine the same situation arising with a blond secret serviceman
possessing a book about the American civil war, but the airline insists it
would have acted in an identical manner.
So, because ethnicity is supposed to have nothing to do with the in-
cident, the airline has resorted to pushing out damaging accounts of the
secret serviceman's behaviour, possibly endangering his career prospects. It
is a recipe for anger. The refusal to acknowledge the issue of ethnicity has
just driven it underground, with the result that neither the effectiveness of
ethnic screening nor its civil rights implications can be properly addressed.
The fact that all 19 of the hijackers involved in the September 11 at-
tacks were Muslim Arabs has inevitably had an effect on the perceptions of
airline pilots and crews. It would be extraordinary if it had not. The over-
whelming majority of trainees who went through al-Qaida's Afghan camps
were Muslims from the Middle East or South Asia. It is possible to argue,
then, that there might be a significant security benefit in giving particular
attention to passengers who fit that profile. On the other hand, the role of a
Briton, Richard Reid, a Muslim with a non-Muslim name, in the shoe-
bomb attempt on an
American Airlines flight before Christmas was a clear reminder that
the assailants in the next attack may not conform to the stereotype. Al-
Qaida has shown itself adept at varying its line of attack. This is a debate
worth having. If it was decided that there was a significant benefit to using
elements of ethnic profiling in security screening, there could be further
discussion of how to minimise the trade-off between security and the civil
rights of those targeted. For example, confirming that a passenger was a
secret serviceman with one of the highest security levels in the land should
have been more than sufficient to outweigh the fact that he was of Arab
descent. These issues are currently being ducked because the phrase «racial
AIRLINE SECURITY: DISHONEST WORDS ON RACIAL PROFILING shows. Furthermore the whole discussion is handicapped, from the Presi-
MUDDY DEBATE ON AIRLINE SECURITY dent down, by a fundamental dishonesty about the issues in play.
It is a fact that Arab-Americans and people with Muslim names have
It was a scene that a Hollywood scriptwriter might have dreamt up been subjected to much more scrutiny than fellow passengers on flights
for one of those earnest television dramas that explore contemporary issues. since September 11. There have been multiple cases of people being left off
But in this real-life scenario there has been no sex or romance. planes because the flight crew and the passengers felt queasy about their
It is Christmas Day, three months after the trauma of September 11, Middle Eastern appearance. A commercial airline pilot I know told me in
and a planeload of exhausted, slightly nervous passengers are heading blunt terms that one of the key items on the «new security» checklist is
home at the last minute for the holidays, on American Airlines flight 363 scanning the passenger manifest for Islamic names. American Airlines'
from Baltimore Washington International airport to Dallas-Fort Worth. As claim that Shater's Arab-American identity and his book on Arab history
has happened on many commercial flights since the terrorist attacks, an had nothing to do with the pilot's decision looks dubious, to say the least. It
Arab-American undergoes scrutiny. is hard to imagine the same situation arising with a blond secret serviceman
He objects, but is ultimately left at the gate. Such situations have be- possessing a book about the American civil war, but the airline insists it
come a fact of life on domestic flights in the United States, but this time it would have acted in an identical manner.
is different. It turns out that the Arab-American, Walied Shater, is a secret So, because ethnicity is supposed to have nothing to do with the in-
serviceman on his way to guard President George Bush at the «Western cident, the airline has resorted to pushing out damaging accounts of the
White House» in Crawford, Texas. Big trouble ensues. secret serviceman's behaviour, possibly endangering his career prospects. It
The Christmas incident was doomed to degenerate into a rhetoric- is a recipe for anger. The refusal to acknowledge the issue of ethnicity has
laden mess as soon as the first lawyer or television pundit used the two just driven it underground, with the result that neither the effectiveness of
words «racial profiling» – one of the hottest of hot-button issues in con- ethnic screening nor its civil rights implications can be properly addressed.
temporary America. The President himself threatened he would be «mad- The fact that all 19 of the hijackers involved in the September 11 at-
der than heck» if it turned out that Shater was a victim of such a practice, in tacks were Muslim Arabs has inevitably had an effect on the perceptions of
which citizens are picked out for special attention because of skin colour, airline pilots and crews. It would be extraordinary if it had not. The over-
name or religion. American Airlines denied Shater had been kicked off the whelming majority of trainees who went through al-Qaida's Afghan camps
flight because of his Arab-American identity. Instead, the troubled airline were Muslims from the Middle East or South Asia. It is possible to argue,
(which lost two planes on September 11) published critical accounts of his then, that there might be a significant security benefit in giving particular
behaviour, describing him as irate and confrontational. He had filled in a attention to passengers who fit that profile. On the other hand, the role of a
form allowing government security officers to carry guns on planes, but Briton, Richard Reid, a Muslim with a non-Muslim name, in the shoe-
had filled it in wrongly twice. His identity was eventually confirmed by the bomb attempt on an
Secret Service, but he had become so truculent by then it was judged best American Airlines flight before Christmas was a clear reminder that
to leave him behind. the assailants in the next attack may not conform to the stereotype. Al-
Shater has hired lawyers to demand an apology and force a change Qaida has shown itself adept at varying its line of attack. This is a debate
in the airline's security measures. The lawyers have gone on television to worth having. If it was decided that there was a significant benefit to using
deny the claims that the presidential bodyguard had behaved unprofession- elements of ethnic profiling in security screening, there could be further
ally. It was the pilot, the lawyers insist, who was confrontational. They say discussion of how to minimise the trade-off between security and the civil
that there had been no problem with the gun-carrying forms until the pilot rights of those targeted. For example, confirming that a passenger was a
became aware of the passenger's Arab-American identity and a flight atten- secret serviceman with one of the highest security levels in the land should
dant discovered a book on Arab history among his possessions. It looks like have been more than sufficient to outweigh the fact that he was of Arab
one of those simmering affairs that will run and run on the radio talk- descent. These issues are currently being ducked because the phrase «racial
53 54
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »
