ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
31
Appendix 3
Read and compare two reviews of this novel written 80
years one after the other. What are the opinions and impressions
of the authors? Why are they so different? Which one do you
share?
a) “The Moon and Sixpence” by W.S. Maugham re-
viewed in the Guardian, May 2 1919.
From the archives
Drawing down the moon
The character of a man insensible to ordinary human relations,
who lives the life of pure selfishness which is sometimes supposed to
produce great art, has always had its fascination for novelists inspired
only by the unusual. Accordingly there have been novels in plenty
depicting the conflict of (by ordinary standards) brutal genius with
uncongenial environment and Mr. Maugham has followed a recognized
convention in this story of an imaginary artist of posthumous greatness.
He treats him throughout with mock respect, and surrounds his affairs
with contributory detail. Mr. Maugham's story is that of a respectable
stockbroker who deserts his wife after seventeen years of marriage and
goes alone to Paris to follow a new ideal – the ideal of great and for a
time unrecognizable art. The break is succeeded by privation and
industry, by long periods of work and outbursts of savage sexual con-
quest; and the artist at length dies, blind and leprous, in Tahiti.
The book revolves throughout around the character of Strickland
and the quality of his art. Does Mr. Maugham so convince us that his
Strickland is a real man and a real artist that we can absorb his traits as
32
parts of the essential human creature who lives eternally by his work? It
seems to us that he does not. Where every detail should be pungently
real, one is constantly checked in belief by the sense of calculated and
heightened effect, and by the passion of Mr. Maugham for what is odd
and "strong." Such a passion has always defeated its object. Here once
more one is repelled, not by Strickland's monosyllabic callousness, but
by the knowledge that this callousness is seen and represented without
subtlety. The callousness of the artist is something more complex than it
is here shown to be. The callousness of Strickland is merely the
conventional brutality employed by other novelists of an older
generation, the generation which first found in the behaviour of artists a
theme to be exploited in fiction. That Mr. Maugham uses the elabo-
rations of a modern technique does not create the illusion of reality that
he is pursuing. It simply emphasizes the cleverness, the clever uncon-
vincingness, of his portrait – not at all the vigour and personality of one
who will starve and suffer for the sake of his artistic ideal.
All the minor drawings in the book are extremely effective, and
the simplicity of the narrative is notable. Technically the whole thing
has great interest. But as an illumination of the nature of bizarre and
uncompromising genius, ready to sacrifice every person and every
association that stands in the way of its fulfillment, "The Moon and
Sixpence" fails through its literary accomplishment and its lack of true
creative inspiration.
b) Review by Edward Tanguay published in the Guard-
ian, August 13, 2002
Before reading this I was a bit afraid that Maugham's fictional
Strickland would somehow distort my conception of Paul Gauguin.
Whether this is true or not, Gauguin's paintings now glow with that vast
Appendix 3 parts of the essential human creature who lives eternally by his work? It seems to us that he does not. Where every detail should be pungently Read and compare two reviews of this novel written 80 real, one is constantly checked in belief by the sense of calculated and years one after the other. What are the opinions and impressions heightened effect, and by the passion of Mr. Maugham for what is odd of the authors? Why are they so different? Which one do you and "strong." Such a passion has always defeated its object. Here once share? a) “The Moon and Sixpence” by W.S. Maugham re- more one is repelled, not by Strickland's monosyllabic callousness, but viewed in the Guardian, May 2 1919. by the knowledge that this callousness is seen and represented without subtlety. The callousness of the artist is something more complex than it From the archives is here shown to be. The callousness of Strickland is merely the conventional brutality employed by other novelists of an older Drawing down the moon generation, the generation which first found in the behaviour of artists a theme to be exploited in fiction. That Mr. Maugham uses the elabo- The character of a man insensible to ordinary human relations, rations of a modern technique does not create the illusion of reality that who lives the life of pure selfishness which is sometimes supposed to he is pursuing. It simply emphasizes the cleverness, the clever uncon- produce great art, has always had its fascination for novelists inspired vincingness, of his portrait – not at all the vigour and personality of one only by the unusual. Accordingly there have been novels in plenty who will starve and suffer for the sake of his artistic ideal. depicting the conflict of (by ordinary standards) brutal genius with All the minor drawings in the book are extremely effective, and uncongenial environment and Mr. Maugham has followed a recognized the simplicity of the narrative is notable. Technically the whole thing convention in this story of an imaginary artist of posthumous greatness. has great interest. But as an illumination of the nature of bizarre and He treats him throughout with mock respect, and surrounds his affairs uncompromising genius, ready to sacrifice every person and every with contributory detail. Mr. Maugham's story is that of a respectable association that stands in the way of its fulfillment, "The Moon and stockbroker who deserts his wife after seventeen years of marriage and Sixpence" fails through its literary accomplishment and its lack of true goes alone to Paris to follow a new ideal – the ideal of great and for a creative inspiration. time unrecognizable art. The break is succeeded by privation and industry, by long periods of work and outbursts of savage sexual con- b) Review by Edward Tanguay published in the Guard- quest; and the artist at length dies, blind and leprous, in Tahiti. ian, August 13, 2002 The book revolves throughout around the character of Strickland Before reading this I was a bit afraid that Maugham's fictional and the quality of his art. Does Mr. Maugham so convince us that his Strickland would somehow distort my conception of Paul Gauguin. Strickland is a real man and a real artist that we can absorb his traits as Whether this is true or not, Gauguin's paintings now glow with that vast 31 32
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »