ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
62
4. The category of comparison 
The category of comparison is constituted by the opposition of three forms 
of the adjective: the positive, the comparative, and the superlative.  
Some grammarians have expressed the view that there are only two degrees 
of comparison. Otto Jespersen, for instance, argues that the positive degree cannot 
be regarded as a degree of comparison as it does not convey the idea of 
comparison.  
According to A.I. Smirnitsky, the degrees of comparison include the positive 
degree and the relative degree which is subdivided into the comparative and the 
superlative degree.  
There are three ways of forming degrees of comparison: synthetic, analytic, 
and suppletive. The synthetic way of forming degrees of comparison is by the 
inflections -er, -est; the analytic way, by placing more and most before the 
adjective. The synthetic way is generally used with monosyllabic adjectives and 
dissyllabic adjectives ending in -y, -ow, -er, -le and those which have the stress on 
the last syllable. However, in the dissyllabic group we can observe radical changes: 
adjectives formerly taking -er and -est are tending to go over to more and most , 
e.g.  more common, most common; more cloudy, most cloudy; more fussy, most 
fussy; more cruel, most cruel; more quiet, most quiet; more clever, most clever; 
more profound, most profound; more simple, most simple; more pleasant, most 
pleasant – all these were normally compared with -er and -est before the WWII. 
All this goes to show that English comparison is getting more and more analytic.  
The question that linguists have been grappling with is: what is the linguistic 
status of analytic forms? Are more and most adverbs of quantity (degree) or 
grammatical word-morphemes? The problem is similar to the problem of the future 
in English. At present linguists are divided on this question: some linguists (A. I. 
Smirnitskyj, B. Khaimovich and B. Rogovskaya, B. Blokh) treat degrees of 
comparison with more and most as analytic constructions proper while others (V. 
N. Zhigadlo, L. S. Barkhudarov, D. A. Shteling,) treat them as free combinations 
of adverbs and adjectives.  
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »
