ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
17
Text 2
STRUCTURE OF THE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
The typical large business enterprise of today in the United Kingdom
consists of a small number of interrelated public companies and numerous
private companies, overall control being vested in a parent company hold-
ing a majority of the equity of its subsidiaries. Reasons for the proliferation
of companies within a business enterprise are many, including a desire to
keep entirely separate types of business apart under specialised manage-
ments, historic factors such as acquisition of other companies, and tax com-
plications.
There has been a greater tendency in the United Kingdom than in the
United States or Germany for the large-scale business enterprises to consist
of a number of diversified businesses each operating on a medium scale
rather than for there to be a massive aggregation of economic power within
a narrow range of industry, as for instance in the American or German steel
and engineering industries. Moreover, when a new business has been ac-
quired by a take-over bid, management has often been retained whilst the
new owners have exercised only general supervision over its affairs.
Many British operating managements consist of boards of directors
of subsidiary companies responsible to a parent board which controls major
capital expenditure and demands a minimum standard of financial perform-
ance. The performance of the subsidiary may well be known only to the
financial executives of the group may have little knowledge of the composi-
tion of the business of which they are the legal owners. Most shareholders
have too small a share of the equity to influence decisions of the manage-
ment whilst, so far, large institutional shareholders have chosen to exert
little influence. Moreover, because of the size and complexity of the group,
the parent board and its specialist advisers may well have only a sketchy
knowledge of the efficiencies of operation of individual subsidiaries.
Over the past few years growing competition in home and foreign
markets and narrowing profit margins have caused many of the large British
industrial groups to examine and to business consultants of British and
American origin have been retained to advise on remedial measures. As a
result of investigations by consultants, and a group's own specialist officers,
there has been much reorganizations of the structure of large British busi-
nesses in recent years, most noticeably in electrical engineering, oil and
chemical companies. Many groups have organised themselves into a num-
ber of separately accounting divisions, each dealing with and coordinating
activities in one of the major business fields in which the group operates.
18
The operations of the divisions have been rationalised, reducing the re-
sources and manpower required to achieve a given output. Unprofitable ac-
tivities have been disposed of by many of these groups by running them
down, by sale to a former competitor within a jointly-owned subsidiary, as
in the case of the merger between AEI-Hotpoint and the EMI domestic ap-
pliance businesses.
Many large British businesses have built up small specialist staff de-
partments at group level which enable group operating managers to exercise
adequate control over operating subsidiaries. The accelerating use of elec-
tronic data-processing machines, both in the number and in the complexity
of problems handled, will allow group managements to exercise more and
more exact overall control of the performance of operating responsibility to
divisional and factory level.
Parent boards of the major joint-stock companies are responsible
mainly to themselves. Overall control usually rests with a dominant person-
ality among their number who controls or guides the overall strategy of the
group.
Text 3
With a difficult agenda of this kind, and given also the very serious
short-term problems which affected the British economy in the early post-
war years, it is not surprising that the subject of economic growth was com-
paratively neglected.
There were also other factors which contributed to this result. First,
the rates of growth which seemed reasonable at the time appeared rather
unglamorously low: it was commonly assumed that the British economy
would continue to grow at something close to what was believed to be pre-
war rate of growth of output per man, of 1½ per cent per annum.
A second additional factor was that some of the main determinants of
growth – in particular, population growth and technical progress – were
often held or assumed to be largely unamenable to explanation in terms of
economic variables. Thus in the systems of thought or models which
economists used as their intellectual frames of reference, these determinants
of growth were often treated as something which had to be taken into ac-
count – at any rate in a long-term view – but which it was not necessarily
the responsibility of the economist to analyse or account for. In technical
language, they were treated as exogenous rather than endogenous variables.
Finally, during the first five to ten years after the war, attention was
to some extent distracted from the analysis of economic growth, not merely
Text 2 The operations of the divisions have been rationalised, reducing the re- STRUCTURE OF THE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE sources and manpower required to achieve a given output. Unprofitable ac- tivities have been disposed of by many of these groups by running them The typical large business enterprise of today in the United Kingdom down, by sale to a former competitor within a jointly-owned subsidiary, as consists of a small number of interrelated public companies and numerous in the case of the merger between AEI-Hotpoint and the EMI domestic ap- private companies, overall control being vested in a parent company hold- pliance businesses. ing a majority of the equity of its subsidiaries. Reasons for the proliferation Many large British businesses have built up small specialist staff de- of companies within a business enterprise are many, including a desire to partments at group level which enable group operating managers to exercise keep entirely separate types of business apart under specialised manage- adequate control over operating subsidiaries. The accelerating use of elec- ments, historic factors such as acquisition of other companies, and tax com- tronic data-processing machines, both in the number and in the complexity plications. of problems handled, will allow group managements to exercise more and There has been a greater tendency in the United Kingdom than in the more exact overall control of the performance of operating responsibility to United States or Germany for the large-scale business enterprises to consist divisional and factory level. of a number of diversified businesses each operating on a medium scale Parent boards of the major joint-stock companies are responsible rather than for there to be a massive aggregation of economic power within mainly to themselves. Overall control usually rests with a dominant person- a narrow range of industry, as for instance in the American or German steel ality among their number who controls or guides the overall strategy of the and engineering industries. Moreover, when a new business has been ac- group. quired by a take-over bid, management has often been retained whilst the new owners have exercised only general supervision over its affairs. Text 3 Many British operating managements consist of boards of directors of subsidiary companies responsible to a parent board which controls major With a difficult agenda of this kind, and given also the very serious capital expenditure and demands a minimum standard of financial perform- short-term problems which affected the British economy in the early post- ance. The performance of the subsidiary may well be known only to the war years, it is not surprising that the subject of economic growth was com- financial executives of the group may have little knowledge of the composi- paratively neglected. tion of the business of which they are the legal owners. Most shareholders There were also other factors which contributed to this result. First, have too small a share of the equity to influence decisions of the manage- the rates of growth which seemed reasonable at the time appeared rather ment whilst, so far, large institutional shareholders have chosen to exert unglamorously low: it was commonly assumed that the British economy little influence. Moreover, because of the size and complexity of the group, would continue to grow at something close to what was believed to be pre- the parent board and its specialist advisers may well have only a sketchy war rate of growth of output per man, of 1½ per cent per annum. knowledge of the efficiencies of operation of individual subsidiaries. A second additional factor was that some of the main determinants of Over the past few years growing competition in home and foreign growth – in particular, population growth and technical progress – were markets and narrowing profit margins have caused many of the large British often held or assumed to be largely unamenable to explanation in terms of industrial groups to examine and to business consultants of British and economic variables. Thus in the systems of thought or models which American origin have been retained to advise on remedial measures. As a economists used as their intellectual frames of reference, these determinants result of investigations by consultants, and a group's own specialist officers, of growth were often treated as something which had to be taken into ac- there has been much reorganizations of the structure of large British busi- count – at any rate in a long-term view – but which it was not necessarily nesses in recent years, most noticeably in electrical engineering, oil and the responsibility of the economist to analyse or account for. In technical chemical companies. Many groups have organised themselves into a num- language, they were treated as exogenous rather than endogenous variables. ber of separately accounting divisions, each dealing with and coordinating Finally, during the first five to ten years after the war, attention was activities in one of the major business fields in which the group operates. to some extent distracted from the analysis of economic growth, not merely 17 18
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »