ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
69
whether or not to kill an innocent person become no more than argu-
ments of advocacy based on hypothetical scenarios of the future.
Terrorists the world over have appropriated concepts and mili-
tary strategies (consider the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and the fire
bombing of Dresden) that originated in the West. This fact should not,
however, in any way debilitate us in our fight against terrorism. No gov-
ernment, no matter what its own past transgressions, should fail to pro-
tect its own citizens. If anything positive can be said about this grim and
ironic situation, it is that as victims of terrorism we may be forced to
rethink our own policies on the use of force (including nuclear force) in
order to bring them into line with our moral denunciations of terrorism.
(7456 символов)
R
R
E
E
L
L
I
I
G
G
I
I
O
O
N
N
A
A
N
N
D
D
T
T
H
H
E
E
M
M
O
O
D
D
E
E
R
R
N
N
W
W
O
O
R
R
L
L
D
D
S
S
T
T
A
A
G
G
E
E
The 20th century may be remembered as the
century in which empires collapsed. The British
Empire, on which «the sun never set» 100 years
ago, is now a faded memory. The Russian empire,
which only 20 years ago was a feared superpower
in its Soviet incarnation, imploded with stunning
rapidity. The Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman em-
pires collapsed earlier, victims of the First World
War.
In the ruins of these and the other empires, an
abundance of new states has emerged. Some have historical roots and
others do not. But they all do face one challenge – to find some ration-
ale for why they should be independent states.
As it turns out, this transition from empires to independent states
has a disturbing precedent in Western history. Look back at the begin-
ning of the 16th century. Back then, Western Europe was nominally
unified because of its allegiance to a single Catholic – or universal –
church. And the Holy Roman Empire was a loose political expression
of this unity.
But this sense of unity began to unravel in the 1520s when Mar-
tin Luther challenged church doctrines, thereby beginning the Protes-
tant Reformation. Already shaken by internal rivalries, the Empire’s
fate was soon sealed. Religious differences undermined the previous
70
sense of unity – and led to conflicts that undermined the bonds holding
the Empire together.
What is striking, comparing the decline of empires then and now,
is the role of religion in creating that indispensable identity for the new
states being formed. In the 16th century, people thought the coexis-
tence of multiple religions in one country would undermine its sense of
community. As the French put it, «one king, one faith, one law.»
In addition, religion provided a vital theme for nation-building
around which people could unite to oppose foreign domination. Thus,
Dutch Protestants rebelled against the rule of Spanish Catholics. And
just a short distance to the west, Irish Catholics similarly resisted the
authority of English Protestants.
«In both societies, a religious cause enhanced – and was en-
hanced by, a sense of national identity,» observes Professor J. H. Elli-
ott. «In both, the affiliation of national leaders to an international reli-
gious movement provided new opportunities for securing international
assistance.»
The potent force of religion in the decline of empires was ini-
tially less evident in the 20th century. To be sure, an Irish republic with
a strong Catholic identity did gain independence in the early part of the
century. And in the late 1940s, when the British empire began to dis-
solve, a Jewish state (Israel) and an Islamic state (Pakistan) emerged.
Nevertheless, the strong identity of religion with national states
did not become apparent until the breakup of the Soviet (Russian) em-
pire. And in a fascinating fashion, the disintegration of Yugoslavia
demonstrated religious identity with nationality, especially with regard
to international support.
How so? Well, just consider that it was Germany – the core of the
earlier Holy Roman Empire – which urged early recognition of Catho-
lic Croatia. Meanwhile, Greece and Russia exhibited strong sympathies
for Orthodox Serbia – and the Islamic world supported Muslim Bosnia.
In the wars that resulted from this multi-layered conflict, the Ser-
bian-Bosnian cause was especially vicious, in large part because of the
religious overtones. «Only God is with us,» exclaimed Radovan Ka-
radzic, now wanted by the Hague War Crimes Tribunal, «although we
are defending Christianity against militant Muslim fundamentalism.»
Indeed, Christian-Muslim warfare is another uncomfortable par-
allel between the present era and the 16th century. Back then, that cen-
whether or not to kill an innocent person become no more than argu- sense of unity – and led to conflicts that undermined the bonds holding ments of advocacy based on hypothetical scenarios of the future. the Empire together. Terrorists the world over have appropriated concepts and mili- What is striking, comparing the decline of empires then and now, tary strategies (consider the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and the fire is the role of religion in creating that indispensable identity for the new bombing of Dresden) that originated in the West. This fact should not, states being formed. In the 16th century, people thought the coexis- however, in any way debilitate us in our fight against terrorism. No gov- tence of multiple religions in one country would undermine its sense of ernment, no matter what its own past transgressions, should fail to pro- community. As the French put it, «one king, one faith, one law.» tect its own citizens. If anything positive can be said about this grim and In addition, religion provided a vital theme for nation-building ironic situation, it is that as victims of terrorism we may be forced to around which people could unite to oppose foreign domination. Thus, rethink our own policies on the use of force (including nuclear force) in Dutch Protestants rebelled against the rule of Spanish Catholics. And order to bring them into line with our moral denunciations of terrorism. just a short distance to the west, Irish Catholics similarly resisted the (7456 символов) authority of English Protestants. «In both societies, a religious cause enhanced – and was en- RELIGION AND THE MODERN WORLD STAGE hanced by, a sense of national identity,» observes Professor J. H. Elli- ott. «In both, the affiliation of national leaders to an international reli- The 20th century may be remembered as the gious movement provided new opportunities for securing international century in which empires collapsed. The British assistance.» Empire, on which «the sun never set» 100 years The potent force of religion in the decline of empires was ini- ago, is now a faded memory. The Russian empire, tially less evident in the 20th century. To be sure, an Irish republic with which only 20 years ago was a feared superpower a strong Catholic identity did gain independence in the early part of the in its Soviet incarnation, imploded with stunning century. And in the late 1940s, when the British empire began to dis- rapidity. The Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman em- solve, a Jewish state (Israel) and an Islamic state (Pakistan) emerged. pires collapsed earlier, victims of the First World Nevertheless, the strong identity of religion with national states War. did not become apparent until the breakup of the Soviet (Russian) em- In the ruins of these and the other empires, an pire. And in a fascinating fashion, the disintegration of Yugoslavia abundance of new states has emerged. Some have historical roots and demonstrated religious identity with nationality, especially with regard others do not. But they all do face one challenge – to find some ration- to international support. ale for why they should be independent states. How so? Well, just consider that it was Germany – the core of the As it turns out, this transition from empires to independent states earlier Holy Roman Empire – which urged early recognition of Catho- has a disturbing precedent in Western history. Look back at the begin- lic Croatia. Meanwhile, Greece and Russia exhibited strong sympathies ning of the 16th century. Back then, Western Europe was nominally for Orthodox Serbia – and the Islamic world supported Muslim Bosnia. unified because of its allegiance to a single Catholic – or universal – In the wars that resulted from this multi-layered conflict, the Ser- church. And the Holy Roman Empire was a loose political expression bian-Bosnian cause was especially vicious, in large part because of the of this unity. religious overtones. «Only God is with us,» exclaimed Radovan Ka- But this sense of unity began to unravel in the 1520s when Mar- radzic, now wanted by the Hague War Crimes Tribunal, «although we tin Luther challenged church doctrines, thereby beginning the Protes- are defending Christianity against militant Muslim fundamentalism.» tant Reformation. Already shaken by internal rivalries, the Empire’s Indeed, Christian-Muslim warfare is another uncomfortable par- fate was soon sealed. Religious differences undermined the previous allel between the present era and the 16th century. Back then, that cen- 69 70
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »