ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
60
are synonyms but not equally appropriate for our purpose. The fist
term is preferable because it is less ambiguous. The term
“semantics” on the other hand, is used to cover several different
meanings. It is also used to denote the phenomena studied, i.e. the
meaning of words and phrases. Had this been all, it might have
been tolerated, because the same double purpose is served by the
terms “phonetics” and “grammar”. In the case of “semantics”,
however, there are other meanings, not sufficiently divorced from
linguistics and apt to create confusion. “Academic semantics”,
also called “pure semantics”, is a branch of symbolic or
mathematic logic originated by R. Carnap. It aims at the building
of an abstract theory of relationships between signs and their
referents (things meant). It is a part of semiotics – the study of
signs and languages in general, including all sorts of codes, such
as military signals, traffic signals, etc. unlike linguistic semantics
which deals with real languages, pure semantic has its subject
formalized language. For a long time it was banned as idealistic
and too abstract to be made use of by linguists. Recently,
however, many scholars show a different attitude and appear to be
deeply interested in the possibilities offered by some
mathematical methods applied to linguistics, especially in the
field of machine translation and information retrieval.
II. An exact definition of any basic term is no easy task
altogether. In the case of lexical meaning it becomes especially
difficult due to the complexity of the process by which language
and human conscience serve to reflect outward reality and to
adapt it to human needs.
The definition of lexical meaning has been attempted more
than once in accordance with the main principles of different
linguistic schools. The disciples of F. de Saussure consider
meaning to be the relation between the object or notion named,
and the name itself. Descriptive linguistics of Bloomfieldian trend
defines the meaning as the situation in which the word is uttered.
Both ways of approach afford no possibility of a further
investigation of semantic problems in strictly linguistic terms, and
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
are synonyms but not equally appropriate for our purpose. The fist term is preferable because it is less ambiguous. The term “semantics” on the other hand, is used to cover several different meanings. It is also used to denote the phenomena studied, i.e. the meaning of words and phrases. Had this been all, it might have been tolerated, because the same double purpose is served by the terms “phonetics” and “grammar”. In the case of “semantics”, however, there are other meanings, not sufficiently divorced from linguistics and apt to create confusion. “Academic semantics”, also called “pure semantics”, is a branch of symbolic or mathematic logic originated by R. Carnap. It aims at the building of an abstract theory of relationships between signs and their referents (things meant). It is a part of semiotics – the study of signs and languages in general, including all sorts of codes, such as military signals, traffic signals, etc. unlike linguistic semantics which deals with real languages, pure semantic has its subject formalized language. For a long time it was banned as idealistic and too abstract to be made use of by linguists. Recently, however, many scholars show a different attitude and appear to be deeply interested in the possibilities offered by some mathematical methods applied to linguistics, especially in the field of machine translation and information retrieval. II. An exact definition of any basic term is no easy task altogether. In the case of lexical meaning it becomes especially difficult due to the complexity of the process by which language and human conscience serve to reflect outward reality and to adapt it to human needs. The definition of lexical meaning has been attempted more than once in accordance with the main principles of different linguistic schools. The disciples of F. de Saussure consider meaning to be the relation between the object or notion named, and the name itself. Descriptive linguistics of Bloomfieldian trend defines the meaning as the situation in which the word is uttered. Both ways of approach afford no possibility of a further investigation of semantic problems in strictly linguistic terms, and 60 PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »