ВУЗ:
Составители:
Рубрика:
7
process by which Spirit comes to full consciousness of itself. Individual relig-
ions thus represent stages in a process of evolution directed toward the great
goal at which all history aims.
Hegel classified religions according to the role that they have played in the
self-realization of Spirit. The historical religions fall into three great divisions,
corresponding with the stages of the dialectical progression. At the lowest level
of development, according to Hegel, are the religions of nature, or religions
based principally upon the immediate consciousness deriving from sense ex-
perience. They include: immediate religion or magic at the lowest level; relig-
ions, such as those of China and India plus Buddhism, that represent a division
of consciousness within itself; and others, such as the religions of ancient Per-
sia, Syria and Egypt, that form a transition to the next type. At an intermediate
level are the religions of spiritual individuality, among which Hegel placed Ju-
daism (the religion of sublimity), ancient Greek religion (the religion of
beauty), and ancient Roman religion (the religion of utility). At the highest level
is absolute religion, or the religion of complete spirituality, which Hegel identi-
fied with Christianity. The progression thus proceeds from man immersed in
nature and functioning only at the level of sensual consciousness, to man be-
coming conscious of himself in his individuality as distinct from nature, and
beyond that to a grand awareness in which the opposition of individuality and
nature is overcome in the realization of Absolute Spirit. Many criticisms have
been offered of Hegel’s classification. An immediately noticeable shortcoming
is the failure to make a place for Islam, one of the major historical religious
communities. The classification is also questionable for its assumption of con-
tinuous development in history. Nevertheless, Hegel’s scheme was influential
and was adapted and modified by a generation of philosophers of religion in the
Idealist tradition.
Sociological studies of religion were undertaken by Auguste Comte who is
considered the founder of modern sociology. His general theory hinged sub-
stantially on a particular view of religion, and this view has somewhat influ-
enced the sociology of religion since that time. In The Positive Philosophy of
Auguste Comte he expounded a naturalistic Positivism and sketched out the fol-
lowing stages in the evolution of thought. First, there is what he called the theo-
logical stage, in which events are explained by reference to supernatural beings;
next, there is the metaphysical stage, in which more abstract unseen forces are
invoked; finally, in the positivistic stage, men seek causes in a scientific and
practical manner. To seek for scientific laws governing human morality and so-
ciety is as necessary, in this view, as to search for those in physics and biology.
A rather separate tradition was created by the German economic theorist
Karl Marx (1818–1883). A number of Marxists, notably Lenin (1870–1924) and
K. Kautsky (1854–1938), have developed social interpretations of religion based
8
on the theory of the class struggle. Whereas sociological functionalists posited
the existence in a society of some religion or a substitute for it (Comte, inciden-
tally, propounded a positivistic religion, somewhat in the spirit of the French
Revolution), the Marxists implied the disappearance of religion in a classless so-
ciety. Thus, in their view religion in man’s primordial communist condition, at
the dawn of the historical dialectic, reflects ignorance of natural causes, which
are explained animistically. Religion, both consciously and unconsciously, be-
comes an instrument of exploitation. In the words of the young Marx, religion is
“generalized theory of the world…its logic in popular form”.
One of the most influential theoreticians of the sociology of religion was
the German scholar Max Weber (1864–1920). He observed that there is an ap-
parent connection between Protestantism and the rise of capitalism, and in The
Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism he accounted for the connection in
terms of Calvinism’s inculcating a this-worldly asceticism, which created a ra-
tional discipline and work ethic, together with a drive to accumulate savings
that could be used for further investment. Weber noted, however, that such a
thesis ought to be tested; and a major contribution of his thinking was his sys-
tematic exploration of other cultural traditions from a sociological point of
view. He wrote influentially about Islam, Judaism, and Indian and Chinese re-
ligions and, in so doing, elaborated a set of categories, such as types of proph-
ecy, the idea of charisma (spiritual power), routinization, and other categories,
which became tools to deal with the comparative material; he was thus the real
founder of comparative sociology. Because of his special interest in religion, he
can also be reckoned a major figure in the comparative study of religion.
In the study of religious psychology the most influential were the psycho-
analysts. A considerable literature has developed around the relationship of psy-
choanalysis and religion. Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, maintained that
inner conflicts-often the result of repression, particularly in relation to sex –
become expressed in peculiarities of behavior and mood, especially in the vivid
imagery of dreams that erupt from the unconscious area of one’s personality.
By comparing the symbolism of dreams and mythology, Freud held that belief
in God – in particular, the father image – merely perpetuates in fantasy what the
individual must in actual fact overcome as part of his growth to maturity, thus
giving religious belief a treatment that not only made belief in God unnecessary
but positively unhelpful.
The Swiss psychoanalyst C.G. Jung (1875–1961) adopted a very different
posture, one that was more sympathetic to religion and more concerned with a
positive appreciation of religious symbolism. Jung considered the question of
the existence of God to be unanswerable by the psychologist and adopted a kind
of agnosticism. Yet he considered the spiritual realm to possess a psychological
reality that cannot be explained away, and certainly not in the manner suggested
process by which Spirit comes to full consciousness of itself. Individual relig- on the theory of the class struggle. Whereas sociological functionalists posited ions thus represent stages in a process of evolution directed toward the great the existence in a society of some religion or a substitute for it (Comte, inciden- goal at which all history aims. tally, propounded a positivistic religion, somewhat in the spirit of the French Hegel classified religions according to the role that they have played in the Revolution), the Marxists implied the disappearance of religion in a classless so- self-realization of Spirit. The historical religions fall into three great divisions, ciety. Thus, in their view religion in man’s primordial communist condition, at corresponding with the stages of the dialectical progression. At the lowest level the dawn of the historical dialectic, reflects ignorance of natural causes, which of development, according to Hegel, are the religions of nature, or religions are explained animistically. Religion, both consciously and unconsciously, be- based principally upon the immediate consciousness deriving from sense ex- comes an instrument of exploitation. In the words of the young Marx, religion is perience. They include: immediate religion or magic at the lowest level; relig- “generalized theory of the world…its logic in popular form”. ions, such as those of China and India plus Buddhism, that represent a division One of the most influential theoreticians of the sociology of religion was of consciousness within itself; and others, such as the religions of ancient Per- the German scholar Max Weber (1864–1920). He observed that there is an ap- sia, Syria and Egypt, that form a transition to the next type. At an intermediate parent connection between Protestantism and the rise of capitalism, and in The level are the religions of spiritual individuality, among which Hegel placed Ju- Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism he accounted for the connection in daism (the religion of sublimity), ancient Greek religion (the religion of terms of Calvinism’s inculcating a this-worldly asceticism, which created a ra- beauty), and ancient Roman religion (the religion of utility). At the highest level tional discipline and work ethic, together with a drive to accumulate savings is absolute religion, or the religion of complete spirituality, which Hegel identi- that could be used for further investment. Weber noted, however, that such a fied with Christianity. The progression thus proceeds from man immersed in thesis ought to be tested; and a major contribution of his thinking was his sys- nature and functioning only at the level of sensual consciousness, to man be- tematic exploration of other cultural traditions from a sociological point of coming conscious of himself in his individuality as distinct from nature, and view. He wrote influentially about Islam, Judaism, and Indian and Chinese re- beyond that to a grand awareness in which the opposition of individuality and ligions and, in so doing, elaborated a set of categories, such as types of proph- nature is overcome in the realization of Absolute Spirit. Many criticisms have ecy, the idea of charisma (spiritual power), routinization, and other categories, been offered of Hegel’s classification. An immediately noticeable shortcoming which became tools to deal with the comparative material; he was thus the real is the failure to make a place for Islam, one of the major historical religious founder of comparative sociology. Because of his special interest in religion, he communities. The classification is also questionable for its assumption of con- can also be reckoned a major figure in the comparative study of religion. tinuous development in history. Nevertheless, Hegel’s scheme was influential In the study of religious psychology the most influential were the psycho- and was adapted and modified by a generation of philosophers of religion in the analysts. A considerable literature has developed around the relationship of psy- Idealist tradition. choanalysis and religion. Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, maintained that Sociological studies of religion were undertaken by Auguste Comte who is inner conflicts-often the result of repression, particularly in relation to sex – considered the founder of modern sociology. His general theory hinged sub- become expressed in peculiarities of behavior and mood, especially in the vivid stantially on a particular view of religion, and this view has somewhat influ- imagery of dreams that erupt from the unconscious area of one’s personality. enced the sociology of religion since that time. In The Positive Philosophy of By comparing the symbolism of dreams and mythology, Freud held that belief Auguste Comte he expounded a naturalistic Positivism and sketched out the fol- in God – in particular, the father image – merely perpetuates in fantasy what the lowing stages in the evolution of thought. First, there is what he called the theo- individual must in actual fact overcome as part of his growth to maturity, thus logical stage, in which events are explained by reference to supernatural beings; giving religious belief a treatment that not only made belief in God unnecessary next, there is the metaphysical stage, in which more abstract unseen forces are but positively unhelpful. invoked; finally, in the positivistic stage, men seek causes in a scientific and The Swiss psychoanalyst C.G. Jung (1875–1961) adopted a very different practical manner. To seek for scientific laws governing human morality and so- posture, one that was more sympathetic to religion and more concerned with a ciety is as necessary, in this view, as to search for those in physics and biology. positive appreciation of religious symbolism. Jung considered the question of A rather separate tradition was created by the German economic theorist the existence of God to be unanswerable by the psychologist and adopted a kind Karl Marx (1818–1883). A number of Marxists, notably Lenin (1870–1924) and of agnosticism. Yet he considered the spiritual realm to possess a psychological K. Kautsky (1854–1938), have developed social interpretations of religion based reality that cannot be explained away, and certainly not in the manner suggested 7 8
Страницы
- « первая
- ‹ предыдущая
- …
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- …
- следующая ›
- последняя »